Longo, U. G., Ciuffreda, M., Candela, V., Berton, A., Maffulli, N., and Denaro, V.
Abstract:
INTRODUCTION: During the past decades, several rating scales have been developed to assess the functional status of patients with hip pain.
SOURCE OF DATA: A search in Medline, PubMed, Cochrane and CINAHL was performedusing combinations of the following'hip', 'scoring system', 'scale', 'scores', 'outcome assessment', 'arthroplasty', 'arthroscopy' and 'clinical evaluation'.
AREAS OF AGREEMENT: A total 16 scoring systems are currently available for the evaluation of the hip.
AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: Two types of questionnaires are available: physician-rated and patient-rated questionnaires.
GROWING POINTS: Each hip score consists of different domains. Interpreting these domains becomes sometimes difficult, because, even though they can be common to more than one scoring system, each stresses them in a different way.
AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: Although many scoring systems have been used to evaluate hip function, we are still far from a single outcome evaluation system which is reliable, valid and sensitive.
