Measurement Properties of Clinical Instruments for Assessing Manual Wheelchair Mobility in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury: Systematic Review
Authors:
de Freitas, G. R., Abou, L., de Lima, A., Rice, L. A., and Ilha, J.
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the measurement properties of clinical instruments used to assess manual wheelchair mobility in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).
DATA SOURCES: This systematic review was conducted according to the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments guidance and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. The search was conducted up to December 2021 on MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Biblioteca Regional de Medicina, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health databases without time restriction.
STUDY SELECTION: Peer-reviewed original research articles that examined any clinical wheelchair mobility and/or skill assessment instrument among adults with SCI and reported data on at least one measurement property or described the development procedure were evaluated independently by two reviewers.
DATA EXTRACTION: Data were independently extracted according to Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments methodology. Measurement property results from each study were independently rated by two reviewers as sufficient, insufficient, indeterminate, or inconsistent. The evidence for each measurement property was rated as high, moderate, low, or very low (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Recommendations for highly-rated instruments were performed.
DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-nine studies with 21 instruments were identified. The methodological quality of studies ranged from insufficient to sufficient, and the quality of evidence ranged from very low to high. Six instruments reported content validity. Reliability and construct validity were the most studied measurement properties. Structural validity and invariance for cross-cultural measurement were not reported. The highly rated instruments were the Wheelchair Outcome Measure and Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire.
CONCLUSIONS: Although numerous instruments for assessing wheelchair mobility and/or skills among individuals with SCI were identified, not many measurement properties have been sufficiently established. The Wheelchair Outcome Measure and Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire show the current best potential to be recommended for clinical and research use. Further studies are needed to strengthen or change these recommendations.