COSMIN database

A systematic review of faces scales for the self-report of pain intensity in children

Authors:
Tomlinson, D., von Baeyer, C. L., Stinson, J. N., and Sung, L.
Abstract:
CONTEXT: Numerous faces scales have been developed for the measurement of pain intensity in children. It remains unclear whether any one of the faces scales is better for a particular purpose with regard to validity, reliability, feasibility, and preference.

OBJECTIVES: To summarize and systematically review faces pain scales most commonly used to obtain self-report of pain intensity in children for evaluation of reliability and validity and to compare the scales for preference and utility.

METHODS: Five major electronic databases were systematically searched for studies that used a faces scale for the self-report measurement of pain intensity in children. Fourteen faces pain scales were identified, of which 4 have undergone extensive psychometric testing: Faces Pain Scale (FPS) (scored 0-6); Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) (0-10); Oucher pain scale (0-10); and Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFPRS) (0-10). These 4 scales were included in the review. Studies were classified by using psychometric criteria, including construct validity, reliability, and responsiveness, that were established a priori.

RESULTS: From a total of 276 articles retrieved, 182 were screened for psychometric evaluation, and 127 were included. All 4 faces pain scales were found to be adequately supported by psychometric data. When given a choice between faces scales, children preferred the WBFPRS. Confounding of pain intensity with affect caused by use of smiling and crying anchor faces is a disadvantage of the WBFPRS.

CONCLUSIONS: For clinical use, we found no grounds to switch from 1 faces scale to another when 1 of the scales is in use. For research use, the FPS-R has been recommended on the basis of utility and psychometric features. Data are sparse for children below the age of 5 years, and future research should focus on simplified measures, instructions, and anchors for these younger children.
DOI:
10.1542/peds.2010-1609
URL:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20921070
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2706563/
Journal:
Pediatrics
issn:
1098-4275 (Electronic)
Publication year:
2010
pages:
e1168-98
Symptom status:
Physical state
Age:
Children (0-18)
Disease:
Symptoms, signs and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings, not elsewhere classified