COSMIN database

Measuring quality of life in dysphonic patients: a systematic review of content development in patient-reported outcomes measures

Authors:
Branski, R. C., Cukier-Blaj, S., Pusic, A., Cano, S. J., Klassen, A., Mener, D., Patel, S., and Kraus, D. H.
Abstract:
To review existing patient reported outcomes measures (PROMs) used in dysphonic populations to assess the procedures used in their development and the extent to which these meet current development standards for content generation and psychometric evaluation. The study is a systematic review. A systematic review of Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health, and Health and Psychosocial Instruments databases was completed using voice, quality of life, and PROMs as keywords. We identified all patient or parent-reported questionnaires measuring quality of life associated with voice disorders from the review findings. Questionnaires were appraised for adherence to international guidelines for the development and evaluation of PROMs as outlined by the Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcome Trust. Nine PROMs fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The quality of these questionnaires was variable with regard to instrument development and none met all of the current, recommended criteria. Of the nine questionnaires, the Voice Symptom Scale underwent the most rigorous development process. Furthermore, many instruments have been augmented to allow for proxy administration, failing to address quality of life-related issues specific to the target population. Instrument development is often overlooked when attempting to quantify patient reported outcomes in dysphonic patients. Careful instrument development procedures are required to ensure that PROMs are valid, reliable, and responsive. Our review suggests that the deficits in psychometric properties of the current voice-related PROMs may be, at least in part, due to deficits in the development process. Furthermore, these data suggest the potential utility of a novel PROM adhering to rigorous international standards to better ensure that clinicians appreciate the variables most relevant to patients with voice disorders and address some of the psychometric shortcomings of the currently used questionnaires.
DOI:
10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.05.006
URL:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19185454
Journal:
J Voice
issn:
1873-4588 (Electronic)
Publication year:
2010
pages:
193-8
Biological and physiological variables:
Biological and physiological variables
Functional status:
Physical functioning
Role functioning
Social functioning
General health perceptions / HRQoL:
Health-related quality of life
Overall quality of life:
Overall quality of life
Age:
Adults (18-65)
Children (0-18)
Seniors (65+)
Disease:
Symptoms, signs and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings, not elsewhere classified
PRO / non-PRO:
Patient Reported Outcome
Type of measurement instrument:
1 - Questionnaires
2 - Interviews
Instrument:
pVHI - Pediatric Voice Handicap Index
PVOS - Pediatric Voice Outcome Survey
PV-RQoL - Pediatric Voice-Related Quality of Life
VAPP - Voice Activity and Participation Profile
VHI-10 - Voice Handicap Index-10 items   [see: ZUYD (NL)]
VHI - Voice Handicap Index   [see: ZUYD (NL)]
VoiSS - Voice Symptom Scale
VOS - Voice Outcome Survey
V-RQOL - Voice-Related Quality of Life measure   [see: ZUYD (NL)]